Traveling, Finale 2012, and Evolution

by Tom Johnson 28. October 2011 07:10


 

 

 

 

This is the Finale 2012 screen where you have to configure a MIDI keyboard. Oh that’s right, now you don’t have to!

In my role as a Finale Product Specialist, I travel the world demonstrating Finale. While I usually have my trusty laptop with me wherever I go, almost everything else can change. When I’m on a huge stage at an international trade show I might have the luxury of using a weighted-action, 88-key MIDI keyboard; if I’m in a school meeting room, a two-octave portable MIDI controller might be a better fit. 

One of the first things I do in preparing for any show is to hook up my hardware and configure Finale to use my current MIDI keyboard. It doesn’t take long, but I have to do it every time I change keyboards, just like anyone who switches between a portable keyboard on the road and a more substantial MIDI device at home or in the studio. But I’ve done that for the last time.

Finale 2012 automatically detects whatever keyboard I’ve plugged in, so I don’t have to configure anything. This is just one benefit among the many advances in Finale 2012, but I think it’s a nice metaphor for Finale as a whole, and an especially apt metaphor for Finale’s evolution.

In a pinch, I could write a score with a pencil and paper. Well, I might struggle with transposing instruments or different clefs, but I could get the notes down on paper, and could imagine what it would sound like. But Finale speeds up the process, creates great-looking pages, plays back, and produces results that can be easily manipulated and shared. 

While all this was true of early versions of Finale, it has since gone through a process of continual evolution. Finale has improved the final results, the ways music can be transformed and shared, and has removed a lot of the busy work. Examples of this can be large, like removing the need to extract parts from your score (Linked Parts now creates and updates my parts automatically) to smaller things, like no longer having to configure MIDI keyboards.

Here’s another example: Today anyone can download the fully functioning Finale 2012 software for FREE (everything but the premium Garritan sounds). This "free trial" is the same exact software you get when you purchase Finale; after 30 days you simply need to authorize it or the ability to save and print will be disabled until you do. Not only does this offer a great way to “try before you buy” it’s also a lifesaver if you ever have to replace or switch computers at the last minute and are away from your install discs.

So I suggest trying Finale 2012 for free. If you’re currently using Finale 2011, I suspect you’ll find the ScoreManager and other improvements as indispensible as I do. If, however, you’re using an older version of Finale, you might be even more amazed at all the stuff you no longer have to do. 

Let me know what you discover by clicking on “Comments” below!

Tags: , , , , ,

General | Tom Johnson

Comments

10/23/2011 11:29:25 PM #

Mike Edward

wait a second, let me get this straight: the developers at MakeMusic decided to expend all that energy on making Finale easier to use... for its sales people when they go to conventions?

wow! no wonder you guys had no time to fix bugs and actually IMPROVE Finale.

Mike Edward Canada

10/24/2011 12:45:29 AM #

Art Greenberg

Hi Tom,
I am very happy with Finale 2012. I use an M-Audio keyboard, and ProFire 610.
Has the crash problem been fixed? I have to uninstall my driver and software if I want to take my laptop out of my studio. Otherwise Finale crashes.  Any  news on this?

Art Greenberg
Robert A. Van Wyck M. S.217Q
Jamaica, NY
SmartMusic Advocate

Art Greenberg United States

10/24/2011 2:08:46 AM #

Justin W. Phillips

Hi Art,

This is unfortunately a known issue if that the hardware is not connected, Finale will try to access it. We're looking at a fix for this.

If you set your laptop to use the internal soundcard before disconnecting the M-Audio, does the same thing happen?

Justin at MakeMusic

Justin W. Phillips United States

10/24/2011 2:18:23 AM #

Scott Yoho

Hi Mike,

Questions surrounding the need to configure a midi device, and how to do it,  have been a top reason users contact our support staff. This improvement addresses this specific customer concern.

Please let us know what specifically you'd like to see in the next version of Finale.

Scott at MakeMusic

Scott Yoho United States

10/24/2011 2:38:15 AM #

Tyler

Hi Tom.

I'm very excited to use Finale 2012 and hope to get it when the year ends. I'm going to be saving up my money for the upgrade and I hope to be as happy and thrilled with Finale 2012 as you are.

Thanks for sharing your experience!

Tyler

Tyler United States

10/24/2011 3:47:55 AM #

Mike Edward

@Scott: bug fixes. There are long-standing bugs in Finale that have still not been addressed. Take a gander at the Finale forum and you will get a good idea of what needs to be fixed and SHOULD have been fixed years ago. Just one example off the top of my head: rest placement in music that uses two (or more) layers is absolutely dismal. Any keyboard writing becomes a never-ending waste of precious time as one adjusts and readjusts rests that collide with beams or that are ridiculously far from the staff.

Another example is Smart Shapes. Why isn't there a more intelligent means of inserting hairpins? No matter what you do, you cannot insert a series of hairpins that are consistent in length, positioning, distance from the staff, etc, without needing to invoke some plugin to add the extra step of placing the hairpins where they SHOULD have been in the very first place.

Let's add to this the disaster that MakeMusic's new "Team" of programmers have created with the aberration that is the new "Score Manager".

Why am I so cynical about it? because MakeMusic is doing EXACTLY what we have been accusing Avid/Sibelius of doing for years: making things "simpler" while taking away functionality.

The new Score Manager does NOT take into consideration people who use multiple VST libraries and who do not use the same set-up for every single composition. Who thought it would be a good idea to have the program choose your instruments for you? Who thought it would be a good idea to remove actual instrument selection from the STARTING process of setting up a score, and add it as an additional step to correct Finale's erroneous instrument choices once the score is set up?

Obviously, the designers are NOT composers.

Tell the powers that be that I, among MANY others, will not be upgrading to Finale 2012. I've been a user since Finale 3, probably longer than many of your employees have been with MakeMusic/Coda. I've dutifully upgraded and appreciated the improvements, year after year.

But Finale 2012 is a massive step backward. I have far harsher words for what I truly think, but they would be considered inappropriate in most civilized circles.

Mike Edward Canada

10/24/2011 11:16:59 AM #

Mike Edward

So, Scott, I notice you don't print comments that are critical of MakeMusic here?
My lengthy answer to your "Please let us know what specifically you'd like to see in the next version of Finale" never appeared here. I guess you don't like having the company's faults aired in public?

Mike Edward Canada

10/25/2011 10:40:55 AM #

Christopher Smith

It's hard to imagine how the free demo of Finale would ever save me on a new computer if I can't print or even save my work. As Mike said above, it would only seem to benefit the salespeople.

Christopher Smith Canada

10/27/2011 10:31:24 AM #

Tom Johnson

Thanks Tyler! I totally know what you mean. One of the great perks of my job is getting the new Finale as soon as it debuts - and to good purpose too. I have already had an amazing response showing Finale to individuals in Austin, New York, Madison, etc. I plan on sharing stories of users whose lives have literally been changed by this new version (seriously) in future blogs. Keep us all here in blogland posted on your success and thanks again for the comment.

Tom at MakeMusic

Tom Johnson United States

10/27/2011 11:10:16 AM #

Justin W. Phillips

Hi Mike,

Finale's layer controls are something we want to take a look at in the near future, along with how rests are positioned and accidental handling.

I know it can be frustrating when features you desired are not included in the new version. What would you like to see for the next version of Finale?

As for the ScoreManager, are you talking about the change from using the Setup Wizard to select a specific library?

Sorry your comment wasn't up immediately, we manually approve all comments (we get a lot of spam on here too) and it may take a day or so for them to appear.

-Justin at MakeMusic

Justin W. Phillips United States

10/27/2011 11:19:26 AM #

Scott Yoho

<<It's hard to imagine how the free demo of Finale would ever save me on a new computer if I can't print or even save my work. As Mike said above, it would only seem to benefit the salespeople.>>

Hi Christopher,

Today’s Finale Free Trial is very different that the Finale Demo of the past. The free trial gives anyone and everyone full access to everything in Finale (minus only the premium Garritan sounds) for 30 days. After that you need to register to restore the ability to print and save.

So the instant you bring home your new computer you can simply download and install Finale 2012 and you’re up and running – any time of the day or night.

I can think of a host of scenarios where you might be away from your computer, but have access to another, and could make good use of a free, downloadable Finale that works for 30 days. Personally, it’ll allow me to do some composing when I visit my folks over the holidays this year.

Please let me know if I haven’t made myself clear – I think it’s a great improvement.

Scott at MakeMusic

Scott Yoho United States

10/27/2011 6:16:57 PM #

Evan Cohen

I recently downloaded Finale 2012 and am delighted that I no longer have to pay for shipping or customs duties!  But it's frustrating year after year that the updated Finale reader isn't ready together with Finale.  In other words, although I'd love to start working on Finale 2012, my colleagues and choir members, can't take advantage of what I can now do, since the Finale Reader is only for versions 2011 and back.

Please in the future release Finale together with the Finale reader so that people can from the get-go can fully utilize the product.  Thanks!

Cantor Evan Cohen

Evan Cohen Israel

10/28/2011 11:11:08 AM #

Scott Yoho

Hi Evan,

Thanks for for your support and feedback.

Best wishes,

Scott at MakeMusic

Scott Yoho United States

10/28/2011 5:11:40 PM #

Christopher Smith

Ah, I get it! You CAN print and save for 30 days. I re-read the first post and understood. I had the (mistaken) impression that printing and saving were disabled from the get-go.

Thank you for the clarification.

On the subject of what I would like to see in future versions of Finale, bug fixes and lacks of functionality arising from new features are on the top of the list. I would be happy to supply a full list, as I have almost every year for the last few versions. Since the list hasn't changed that much for about five years (except for chords that now transpose correctly with chromatically-transposing staves, thank you for that!) I am starting to lose motivation.

Christopher

Christopher Smith Canada

10/28/2011 9:13:55 PM #

Scott Yoho

Hi Christopher,

I'd ask that you send me your list, and, if you wish, to share here what you would MOST like to see in the next version of Finale; what's at the top of your priority list?

Scott at MakeMusic

Scott Yoho United States

10/29/2011 3:30:38 AM #

Daniel Menjivar

Hey Mike:

I have to agree – the new Score Manager is very counterintuitive – it doesn't make sense that you can't select the instruments when creating a new score.  I work arranging Salsa and Latin Jazz about 95% of the time, but if I want to use the jazz samples that come with the Garritan library, I have to manually make the changes after creating the new file.  Making a template doesn't make sense since I'm writing for different instrumentations all the time (although I do have a custom document style that I tweak now and then).  I love that with every new version of Finale there are a lot of time savers added, but Finale 2012 is the first version that makes my workflow a lot longer and much more difficult.

What's worse, however, is that the instrument list (when creating a new score) is not sorted in any logical order.  Maybe it's in concert/classical score order?  Whatever it is, it doesn't make any sense and it complicates what should be an easy START...  (Let's say, for example, you wanted to add a "Trompeta China" to a new arrangement.  Where would you find that instrument?  Not in brass, where you'd think.  It's under woodwinds, and you have to search through a long unorganized list in order to find it.)

The option to have this list sorted alphabetically would be nice, and even better would be the ability to just type in the name of the instrument into a search box and have it come up...  (Kind of like how the media browser works in Logic.)

In theory, the new score manager is nice, but in practice it's still in alpha – far from even beta – and it makes the whole process of starting a new arrangement much more complicated and difficult.  It shows promise, but its far from what I would consider "ready"...

I use Finale on a daily basis and I upgrade every year.  I like Finale and can't image using anything else, but at the same time, I always joke about having a "love/hate" relationship with Finale.  This is the first year that I've regretted "upgrading" though, and on a daily basis I find myself contemplating if I should downgrade back to Finale 2011.  The new score manager in Finale 2012 sounds like a good idea, but in using it every day, so far, it has proved that it's a big step backwards in terms of workflow.  It's too bad really...

DM

Daniel Menjivar Canada

10/31/2011 12:51:40 AM #

Justin W. Phillips

Hi Daniel,

Thanks for the feedback. While the new instrument selection works fantastically for most users, I can see in your case when you want to select very specific sounds that the new process can change your original workflow for loading sounds.

I submitted a request to look at this for a future update, and hopefully we can ease this process when you want to select a very specific sound from the original Setup Wizard.

-Justin at MakeMusic

Justin W. Phillips United States

11/2/2011 9:30:20 PM #

Christopher Smith

Hi Scott,

You asked for it! I am not including my bug list here, as I am still testing it on 2012, but it is over 20 items so far. This is only my wish list.

Wish List for new features or functionality:

opt-= in Speedy should ALWAYS create a backwards tie, even if there is nothing in the previous measure. Right now, it only creates a backwards tie if there is something in the previous measure. Even in 2nd endings, if the 1st ending is empty, you cannot create a backwards tie, and you should be able to.

Smart repeat ending boxes, that resize themselves automatically when there is a multimeasure rest, the way Smart Shapes do.

Smarter avoidance of articulations and slurs. Putting slurs outside articulations is fine, but what about when articulations must be outside slurs?

A way for cues to work with linked, voiced parts, where the cue shows up in the parts correctly (even with the cue in a different layer!) but not in the score. Also, the cue should still work properly even if there are real notes in the same measure as the cue. The only way to accomplish this right now is to have a separate file WITH cues, where every instrument is exploded to its own staff, and another file for the score without cues and instruments like flute 1 and 2 on the same staff.

When working with the new Lyric tool, it would be great to have a way to switch quickly from Shift Lyrics to the Left and Shift Lyrics to the Right, say with a keyboard modifier key like the right and left arrows, or comma and period. When I enter an average set of imported lyrics, I sometimes have to switch between Click Assignment, Shift Left and Shift Right every syllable or two, which is very slow and mouse intensive right now.

Hide and Show contextual menu items should work with the modifier key even when I am in the Selection Tool. At present holding the Command key down to toggle linking only works with the tool that created the item.

Chord Suffix Selection dialogue box should have the Create, Edit, Duplicate, Delete, Move Down and Move Up buttons available EVERY time the dialogue box is called, say when you type C:0 when typing in chords.

Nudge keys should work in the Chord Suffix Editor.

Expressions should have justification (centre, and right justification.) Am I right in thinking that this is the only thing separating Text from Expressions right now?

Partial point sizing of text items, like 10.5 points.

Crescendo connected to a diminuendo with a slight space, all in one Smart Shape that never loses the alignment and spacing between the two halves, and also the reverse expression:

<> and ><
Also, the ability to have a starting, ending and middle text for crescendos like we do for plain Smart Lines, like

p < f
or
sfzmf > p < ff where the p point is slideable left to right.

Maybe I’m alone, but I wish we had the Mibac Rhythm Section Generator plugin back again for playback. I think Band In A Box actually creates better accompaniments, but even the MIBAC plugin was better than nothing.

The BIAB auto harmoniser sucked big time, so I don’t miss it, but my colleague Richard Ferland wrote a piece of software for Mac called Harmonist, which would have made an admirable plugin. It adhered to much more rigourous standards of jazz than the BIAB plugin did.

When I open an older file where I had to manually transpose the chord symbols in a staff using chromatic transposition, I get a dialogue box warning me about the need in new versions of Finale to check the transposition of chords. Why couldn’t Finale just preserve the correct chords when importing the file? It is reasonable to assume that when opening an old file that we want everything to stay as we had left it. If Finale has a new way to do things, let Finale figure out how to preserve the old notation. This is one of the newer problems related to bug #1, importation of old files.

Christopher Smith Canada

11/4/2011 11:34:23 PM #

Scott Yoho

Hi Christopher,

Thanks for taking the time to create such an in-depth list. I asked Justin to take a look as well and he agreed you made some excellent suggestions. We have shared the details with our development team.

Best wishes,

Scott at MakeMusic

Scott Yoho United States

11/8/2011 4:17:48 AM #

trackback

Take Your Music Further with Finale 2012

Take Your Music Further with Finale 2012

Finale

Comments are closed

Powered by BlogEngine.NET 1.5.0.7
Theme by Mads Kristensen

Welcome!

This blog was created to provide an interactive means to share commentary and tips on the Finale family of music notation products.

RecentComments

Comment RSS